Georgia DOT-Resolution of the State Transportation Board Regarding Complete Streets
Effective: 9/19/12 – Through: 5/31/23
WHEREAS, Complete Streets is the practice of planning, designing and constructing streets and roadways that integrate and balance the needs of pedestrians, bicyclists, transit riders, and motor vehicle traffic; and
WHEREAS, the State Transportation Board is committed to providing safe, adequate, and balanced accommodations for pedestrians, bicyclists, and transit users, regardless of age or ability, wherever it is practical to do so; and
WHEREAS, the projected doubling of Georgia’s senior citizen population over the next 20 years is evidence of the increased need for community based transportation options that are less dependent on driving; and
WHEREAS, providing options for individuals with disabilities requires making available access to a broader range of transportation options; and
WHEREAS, the full integration of all modes of travel in the design of streets and roadways will reduce traffic congestion, improve mobility, and provide more reliable commute times; and
WHEREAS, the State Transportation Board supports communities that provide pedestrian, bicycle, and transit accommodations between residential and school districts, parks, public facilities, and commercial and employment districts; and
WHEREAS, the Georgia Department of Transportation has the opportunity to create and improve transportation facilities for all users by implementing Complete Streets principles and standards into appropriate GDOT projects; and
WHEREAS, the Georgia Department of Transportation has coordinated with the Atlanta Bicycle Coalition, Atlanta Regional Commission, City of Atlanta, City of Decatur, City of Roswell, Cobb Community Transit, Federal Highway Administration, Federal Transit Administration, Georgia Bikes, Georgia Municipal Association, Georgia Regional Transportation Authority, Gwinnett County Transit, MARTA, National Complete Streets Coalition, and PEDS to understand users and needs; and
WHEREAS, the Georgia Department of Transportation partners with local governments, regional commissions and MPOs, to incorporate Complete Streets principles into local transportation projects through special programs such as Safe Routes to School, Transportation Enhancement, Livable Centers Initiative, Georgia Transit, and the Georgia Rail Passenger Program.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the State Transportation Board supports the advancement of accessibility for pedestrian, bicycle, and transit modes of transportation along streets and roadways in Georgia with the goal of reducing congestion, improving mobility, and enhancing the quality of life for all users.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Georgia Department of Transportation staff is directed to adopt policies, guidelines and standards as necessary for the successful implementation of Complete Streets.
[…]
City of Atlanta, Georgia Ordinance 18-O-1709 AN ORDINANCE BY TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE TO ADOPT ATLANTA’S TRANSPORTATION PLAN, AN UPDATE TO THE 2008 CONNECT ATLANTA PLAN; AND TO ADOPT THE ATLANTA MULTIMODAL STREETS POLICY; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES.
Effective: 12/2/18 – Through: 5/31/23
WHEREAS, the Connect Atlanta Plan was adopted in 2008, Ordinance number 08-O-2232, as the City of Atlanta’s first Comprehensive Transportation Plan to guide the City’s transportation policies, goals, and priorities; and
WHEREAS, the Atlanta Regional Commission (“ARC”) named the City of Atlanta (“City”) as the recipient of the Comprehensive Transportation Plan Funding Assistance Program in the amount of $1,000,000.00 on condition that the City match $250,000.00 for a total cost of $1,250,000.00 to prepare Atlanta’s Transportation Plan, an update to the existing 2008 Connect Atlanta Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Department of City Planning engaged and directed a consultant team to produce Atlanta’s Transportation Plan, a city-wide collaborative study involving the public, neighborhoods, regional and state governmental agencies, community improvement districts, and local elected officials; and
WHEREAS, great efforts were made to engage the public by hosting a kick-off meeting, public meetings, public outreach work sessions, pop-ups in various places around the City, on-line surveys, forming a selected technical advisory committee and a stakeholder committee whose membership was open to anyone who requested and was willing to participate; and
WHEREAS, the Department of City Planning and consultants identified additional transportation solutions and financing strategies to meet the demands of population growth and promote Atlanta as an attractive place for area residents and visitors to work, shop, and play through a balanced transportation system that accommodates all travel modes; and
WHEREAS, Atlanta’s Transportation Plan is based on the vision and growth projections articulated in City Design and incorporates transportation project recommendations from the 2008 adopted Connect Atlanta Plan, the MORE MARTA Program, Renew Atlanta, TSPLOST, Streetcar System Plan, adopted Livable Centers Initiative (LCI) and neighborhood sub-area plans and studies; and
WHEREAS, Atlanta’s Transportation Plan priorities will form the basis for future funding submittals for the Transportation Improvement Program developed by the ARC; and
WHEREAS, approval of site plans, transportation recommendations and projects, and funding requests will be based upon their level of consistency with Atlanta’s Transportation Plan and supplemental studies derived from Atlanta’s Transportation Plan; and
WHEREAS, Atlanta’s Transportation Plan is a guide for the City’s future transportation planning efforts and transportation and development decisions; and access strategy to support the implementation of the Atlanta City Design document which was incorporated into the Charter of the City of Atlanta, Ordinance number 17-O-1706; and
WHEREAS, Atlanta’s Transportation Plan addresses the connections between local and regional land use and transportation decisions and serves as input in developing ARC’s future regional plans, which creates stronger connection of local priorities to regional goals; and
WHEREAS, Atlanta’s Transportation Plan consists of the Atlanta’s Transportation Plan summary report document; 13 technical memoranda addressing the following subjects: Asset Management, Bicycle Facilities, Intelligent Transportation Systems, Multimodal Urban Growth Model Methodology, New Mobility and Technology, Pedestrian Facilities, Performance Monitoring, Project Evaluation Methodology, Public Engagement Summary, Public Transportation, Safer Streets, Transportation Demand Management, and Transportation Funding; and two appendices: the Cycle Atlanta 2.0 Study, and Streets Atlanta, A Design Manual for Multimodal Streets; and
WHEREAS, Atlanta’s Transportation Plan establishes the need for a multimodal street policy; and
WHEREAS, the City of Atlanta’s Multimodal Streets Policy establishes and creates the policy framework required to achieve active, balanced, and multimodal streets in the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATLANTA, GEORGIA, HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION 1. That Atlanta’s Transportation Plan including all accompanying technical memoranda and appendices, is hereby adopted as an update for the implementation and promotion of the City’s transportation policies and goals. Atlanta’s Transportation Plan is attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by reference.
SECTION 2. That Atlanta’s Transportation Plan is hereby incorporated into section 7 of the Atlanta Comprehensive Development Plan, updated and adopted in 2016, Ordinance number 16-O-1538. In the event of a conflict, the recommendations and policies of Atlanta’s Transportation Plan shall govern and override any other transportation elements of the Atlanta Comprehensive Development Plan unless otherwise noted in the Plan.
SECTION 3: That the City of Atlanta shall adopt the following Multimodal Streets Policy:
The City of Atlanta shall design, build, operate and maintain a multimodal transportation network that will promote safe, healthy, low stress, affordable, and convenient methods of transportation for all users regardless of age, abilities, race or economic status. Multimodal design will insure future mobility access while promoting social equity, improved health, economic growth, public safety, recreational opportunity, and environmental sustainability throughout the City of Atlanta.
SECTION 4:
That guidelines for the implementation of the Multimodal Streets Policy shall be maintained by the Department of Public Works.
SECTION 5: That all ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions herein are hereby waived to the extent of the conflict.
Georgia Department of Transportation Complete Streets Design Policy (Georgia Department of Transportation Design Policy Manual, Chapter 9)
Effective: 7/23/2024 – Through: 7/23/2024
9.1. Overview
It is the policy of the Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT) to routinely incorporate bicycle, pedestrian, and transit accommodations into transportation infrastructure projects as a means for improving mobility, access, and safety for the traveling public. Accordingly, GDOT coordinates with local governments and planning organizations to ensure that bicycle, pedestrian, and transit needs are addressed, beginning with system planning and continuing through design, construction, maintenance and operations. This is the “Complete Streets” approach for promoting pedestrian, bicycle, and transit travel in the State of Georgia.
The concept of Complete Streets emphasizes safety, mobility, and accessibility for all modes of travel and for individuals of all ages and abilities. The design of transportation projects for multiple travel modes requires balancing the needs of each mode. This “balance” must be accomplished in a context sensitive manner appropriate to the type of roadway and the conditions within the project and surrounding area.
This policy is consistent with the following statement taken from the U.S. Department of Transportation, Policy Statement on Bicycle and Pedestrian Accommodation Regulations and Recommendations:
The DOT policy is to incorporate safe and convenient walking and bicycling facilities into transportation projects. Every transportation agency, including DOT, has the responsibility to improve conditions and opportunities for walking and bicycling and to integrate walking and bicycling into their transportation systems. Because of the numerous individual and community benefits that walking and bicycling provide — including health, safety, environmental, transportation, and quality of life — transportation agencies are encouraged to go beyond minimum standards to provide safe and convenient facilities for these modes.
GDOT’s primary strategy for implementing Complete Streets is to incorporate bicycle, pedestrian, and transit accommodations into roadway construction and maintenance projects. Local governments and planning agencies can also implement Complete Streets by partnering with GDOT, and by initiating and managing their own locally-funded projects and programs. GDOT assists local governments and metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs) by administering special programs such as Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP), Livable Centers Initiative (LCI), or federally funded programs. In addition, GDOT provides oversight to the State’s Passenger Rail programs to promote motorized transit alternatives such as bus, van-pool, and rail travel.
Altogether, these efforts advance an incremental approach for developing local, regional, and statewide multimodal transportation networks. This approach also supports a primary objective of the Statewide Strategic Transportation Plan to increase the overall health and prosperity of citizens and businesses that use and depend on Georgia’s transportation system.
Pedestrians and bicyclist are allowed on nearly every roadway in Georgia, with the exception of those routes with Full-Control-Access such as interstate highways and major freeways (see Chapter 3.5 Establishment of Access Control for definition of types of access control). This policy is consistent with OCGA § 32-6-113 (ability to design limited-access roadways) and OCGA § 40-6-51 (regulation of controlled-access roadways within jurisdiction). Typical signage used to regulate pedestrians and bicycles on Full-Control-Access facilities is shown below in Figure 9.1.
9.1.1. Principles
The following principles form a basis for the bicycle and pedestrian accommodation policies presented in the remainder of this chapter:
1. Accommodations for bicycles and pedestrians should be integrated into roadway construction projects through design features appropriate to the context and function of the transportation facility.
2. The design and construction of new facilities should anticipate likely demand for bicycling and pedestrian facilities within the design life of the facility.
3. The design of intersections and interchanges should accommodate bicyclists and pedestrians in a manner that addresses the need to safely cross roadways, as well as to travel along them.
4. The design of new and reconstructed roadways should not preclude the future accommodation of bicyclists and pedestrians along and across corridors.
5. While it is not the intent of maintenance resurfacing to expand existing facilities, opportunities to provide facilities or to enhance safety for pedestrians and bicyclists should be considered during the development of these projects. The following principles form a basis for the transit accommodation policies presented in the remainder of this chapter:
1. Accommodations for transit should be integrated into roadway construction projects through design features appropriate for the context and function of the roadway, and associated transit facility (e.g., transit stops, stations, or park-and-ride lots).
2. The design of roadways and intersections should address the need of pedestrians to safely walk along and across roadways, to access nearby transit facilities.
3. The design of new and reconstructed roadways should not preclude the accommodation of transit facilities (e.g., for light rail, street cars, and bus rapid transit) planned and funded for construction within the design life of the roadway project.
9.1.2. References Planning References
Refer to the most current edition of the following publications for planning considerations related to pedestrian, bicycle, and transit facilities:
• Georgia Guidebook for Pedestrian Planning, GDOT, 2006.
• Georgia Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety Action Plan, GDOT, Governor’s Office of Highway Safety (GOHS).
• Pedestrian Safety Guide for Transit Agencies. FHWA, 2008. Consult adopted state, regional, and local planning documents to help identify existing and planned pedestrian, bicycle, and transit facilities. Below are the major types of planning documents commonly adopted by local governments, MPOs, and regional commissions.
• State and regional long range transportation plans.
• City/County comprehensive transportation plans.
• City/County bicycle master plans.
• City/County pedestrian master plans.
• City/County unified public work plans.
• City/County transit development plans.
• City/County transit improvement plans.
• Statewide transit improvement plans.
Where used to evaluate warrants (refer to Section 9.4 Warrants for Accommodation of this manual), information from the above planning documents should be verified with the organization originating the document. The GDOT State Bicycle and Pedestrian Coordinator should be consulted in the event that planning documents show conflicting information about a specific facility and to verify that information shown is current and correct. Corridor or facility planning studies may also be considered.
Design References
Refer to the most current edition of the following publications for the design of pedestrian, bicycle, and transit accommodations:
• Accessible Public Rights-of-Way, Planning and Designing for Alterations, Public Rights-ofWay Access Advisory Committee, 2007.
• Accessible Sidewalks and Street Crossings – An Informational Guide, FHWA, 2004.
• Achieving Multimodal Networks Applying Design Flexibility & Reducing Conflicts, FHWA, 2016.
• Bikeway Selection Guide, FHWA, 2019.
• Context Sensitive Design Manual, GDOT, 2022.
• Designing Sidewalks and Trails for Access, Part II of II: Best Practices Design Guide, FHWA, 2001. (Note: web HMTL version incorporates corrections in the errata sheet.)
• Designing Walkable Urban Thoroughfares: A Context Sensitive Approach, Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) and Congress for the New Urbanization (CNU), 2010.
• FHWA Bicycle & Pedestrian Program – Design Guidelines web page, Federal Highway Association (FHWA). http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/bicycle_pedestrian/guidance/design_guidance/
• Guide for Geometric Design of Transit Facilities on Highways and Streets, AASHTO, 2014.
• Guide for High-Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) Facilities, AASHTO, 2004.
• Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities, AASHTO, 2012.
• Guide for the Planning, Design, and Operation of Pedestrian Facilities, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), 2004.
• Highway Capacity Manual 2010 (HCM2010), TRB, 2010.
• Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), FHWA, 2009.
• Pedestrian and Streetscape Guide, GDOT, 2019.
• Proposed Guidelines for Public Rights-of-Way (PROWAG) 2, United States Access Board, 2011.
• Safety Effects of Marked Versus Unspaned Crosswalks at Uncontrolled Locations, FHWA, 2005.
• Separated Bike Lane Planning and Design Guide, FHWA, 2015.
• Urban Bikeway Design Guide, National Association of City Transportation Officials (NATCO). (Refer to the FHWA document Bicycle Facilities and the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for the status of specific bicycle facilities in FHWA’s MUTCD.)
Additional References
• The following publications may also be helpful references: Improving Pedestrian Safety at Unsignalized Crossings (TCRP 112/NCHRP 562), Transit Cooperative Research program
(TCRP) and National Cooperative Research Program (NCHRP), 2006.
• Local Street Design Guides (where applicable).
• Management and Design Guidelines for the Regional Thoroughfare Network, Atlanta Regional Commission (ARC).
• Medians and Pedestrian Crossing Islands in Urban and Suburban Areas, FHWA Office of Safety, Proven Safety Countermeasures.
• Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon, FHWA Office of Safety, Proven Safety Countermeasures.
• Urban Street Design Guide, NATCO, 2013.
• Safe Route to Transit, Pedestrians Educating Drivers on Safety (PEDS), 2014
9.1.3. Definition of Accommodation
An accommodation is here defined as any facility, design feature, operational change, or maintenance activity that provides or improves either non-motorized and/or transit travel. The type of accommodation will vary by location and the needs of expected users, but the safety and accessibility of all modes should be considered for all projects where these modes are allowed.
Commonly applied non-motorized user accommodations include sidewalks, curb ramps, pedestrian crossings, bicycle lanes, bikeable shoulders, shared-use paths, pedestrian activated signals, and midblock treatments such as spaned crosswalks, median islands, signs, lighting, and accessibility features; and/or other treatments as necessary such as landscaping decisions.
Transit accommodations address pedestrian access to and from transit stops, stations and park and ride lots as well as accommodations for transit vehicles accessing these facilities and traveling along the corridor. Commonly applied accommodations for users include sidewalks, crosswalks, pedestrian push-buttons and signal heads etc… Examples of transit accommodations at bus stops include loading pads and pull-outs. A wide range of transit accommodations are described in Toolkit 9 of the GDOT Pedestrian Streetscape Guide, Chapter 9 of the ITE publication Designing Walkable Urban Thoroughfares: A Context Sensitive Approach, the AASHTO Guide for Geometric Design of Transit Facilities on Highways and Streets, and the PEDS Safe Routes to Transit.
9.2. Typical Users & Needs
The selection and design of accommodations require a clear understanding of the users to be benefited. Organizations in Georgia which promote pedestrian, bicycle and transit modes of travel are helpful resources for understanding these users and their needs.
Pedestrians and bicyclists are often grouped together and referred to as non-motorized users. Both user groups generally travel at the far right or alongside the roadway, are generally slower than adjacent motor vehicles, and are more influenced by their immediate surroundings. Since both non-motorized modes travel under their own power and are more exposed to the elements, both often prefer direct routes or shortcuts to minimize their effort and time.
Most transit users access transit facilities as pedestrians or bicyclists and therefore have needs that are very similar to those of non-motorized users. Other transit users access transit via other transit or drop off from personal vehicles.
9.2.1. Pedestrians
A pedestrian is defined as a person afoot. This includes children, senior citizens, and people with physical disabilities; these groups may require additional considerations. Pedestrians also include individuals in wheel chairs (motorized or non-motorized) and on skates and skateboards.
Most transportation trips begin or end with walking. Many pedestrians choose to walk for convenience, personal health, or out of necessity. They often prefer greater separation from the roadway, require additional time to cross roadways, and are the most vulnerable of all roadway users. In addition, pedestrians will often seek to minimize travel distance, choosing direct routes and shortcuts even when facilities are not provided. Walking trips are often combined with transit for traveling longer distances; making accessibility to transit stops and stations an important consideration.
In urban areas, walking trips are often combined with private motor vehicle trips. In this case, people often park once and then walk between stores, restaurants and other facilities/services.
9.2.2. Bicyclists
Bicycling trips serve both utilitarian and recreational purposes, often in the same trip. Utilitarian trips are trips that are a necessary part of a person’s daily activity such as commuting to work, shopping or errands, or taking a child to school. Recreational trips are usually discretionary trips made for exercise and/or leisure.
Rider age and skill level vary considerably. Utilitarian bicyclists are generally more experienced and confident and will typically choose whichever roadway (or off-road facility) provides for the most direct, safe and comfortable travel to their destinations. Recreational bicyclists are generally younger and/or less experienced and will typically choose routes for comfort or scenery, feel more comfortable on lower-speed and lower-volume roadways, and prefer separated or delineated bicycle facilities. Children have a wide range of skills and cognitive ability and will typically travel only on separated facilities and very low-volume, low-speed residential streets. Where allowed by local government ordinance or resolution, children below the age of 12 may also ride on sidewalks.
See OCGA § 40-6-144 for further explanation.
Bicyclists utilize public roadways for most trips and are therefore subject to vehicular laws. Therefore, the bicycle facility should be designed to encourage bicycling behavior that is as predictable as possible when interacting with motor vehicle traffic.
9.2.3. Transit Users
Transit serves a vital transportation function by providing people with freedom of movement and access to employment, schools, community and recreational facilities, medical care, shopping centers, and to other communities. Transit directly benefits those who choose this form of travel, as well as those who have no other choice or means of travel. Transit also benefits motor vehicle users by helping to reduce congestion on roadway networks.
A vital part of the success of a transit system depends on the availability of safe and easy access to transit stations, stops and park-and-ride facilities. Accordingly, transit user accommodations along and across streets served by transit (and on streets that lead to transit corridors) should provide safe and convenient pedestrian access to and from these facilities. Users also commonly access transit by bicycle, car and taxi, as well as other modes of transit.
9.2.4. Needs and Volumes
The degree of non-motorized/transit use and their needs should be determined during the project planning or concept development phases. Defining usage and needs will often require local input and can often be accomplished during the initial concept meeting, by reconnaissance of the project area, and/or at meetings with local officials and stakeholders. Public Information Open House (PIOH) meetings are also a useful venue for obtaining this type of information.
Planning studies for bicycle, pedestrian, and transit travel normally consider the number of users, their typical needs, and significant barriers to travel. This includes measuring current and projecting future travel, evaluating existing conditions, and identifying constraints and opportunities. For bicycle and pedestrian travel, typical planning tools may include non-motorized traffic counts, Bicycle, Pedestrian and Transit Level of Service formulas (refer to HCM2010), Latent Demand (i.e., potential demand) Scores, user surveys, information from transit service providers, and public input. These tools all help establish expected level of usage, destinations, and facility needs above the most basic routine project accommodations.
For transit within urbanized areas; applicable MPOs, regional commissions, and local governments should be contacted to identify specific transit agency(s) providing services on or near the project alignment. Transit agencies identified through this coordination should then be contacted to verify the location of routes and facilities.
The findings of investigations relating to non-motorized and transit users should be documented in the concept report. These findings may be qualitative in nature, but must be sufficient to evaluate the warrants presented in Section 9.4 of this chapter. If the project is expected to adversely impact existing bicycle, pedestrian or transit accommodations, these impacts should be noted.
9.3. User Networks
9.3.1. Pedestrian Networks
Pedestrian networks and associated facilities provide access between local destinations within neighborhoods, towns, and cities. Individual pedestrian networks are interconnected by means of transit, bicycle, and motor vehicle networks to allow for travel between these areas. Facilities that comprise these networks commonly include: sidewalks, crosswalks, shared-use paths, pedestrian underpasses and overpasses, and wide shoulders or sidewalks in rural areas.
Well-developed pedestrian networks provide continuous, direct routes and convenient connections between destinations, such as homes, schools, shopping areas, public services, recreational facilities, and transit. These types of destinations are more densely distributed in urban areas.
Many regional commissions, MPOs, and local governments have adopted plans for pedestrian networks. An example is provided as Figure 9.2 Pedestrian Network Map for Gainesville – Hall MPO (2006). Refer to the Gainesville–Hall MPO Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan for more information on this network. Where available, such maps should be consulted in order to evaluate the
pedestrian warrants presented in Section 9.4.1 Pedestrian Warrants of this Manual. The applicable local government, MPO or regional commission which prepared the map may be contacted to verify the location and intended forms of pedestrian accommodation. For most urban areas, maps will not be available. Consequently, the need for pedestrian accommodations should always consider local and projected conditions along and near the corridor being improved.
The GDOT State Bicycle and Pedestrian Coordinator (within the Safety Unit of the GDOT Office of Traffic Operations) may be consulted with any questions.
Urban areas are classified by the US Bureau of the Census as either “urbanized areas”, “urban cluster areas”, or rural areas. The boundaries for urbanized areas and urban cluster areas are shown on Urban Area Boundary Maps on the GDOT web page Statewide Functional Classification & Urban Area Boundary Update. Please see the embedded links for the Georgia MPO’s and regional commissions. These areas are defined below.
• Urbanized Area: an area with a population of more than 50,000. There are 15 urbanized areas within Georgia, each corresponding to one of Georgia’s 15 MPOs.
• Urban Cluster area: is an area with a population between 2,500 and 49,999. For planning purposes, urban cluster areas are represented by one of Georgia’s 12 regional commissions.
• Rural Area: an area having a population of less than 50,000. Rural areas are represented by one of the 12 regional commissions. The rural area of Georgia includes everything outside of urbanized and urban cluster areas.
Atlanta, Multimodal Streets Policy: Implementation Guidelines
Effective: 12/31/17 – Through: 5/31/23
1.0 POLICY
The City of Atlanta shall design, build, operate and maintain a multimodal transportation network that will promote safe, healthy, low stress, affordable, and convenient methods of transportation for all users regardless of age, abilities, race or economic status. Multimodal design will insure future mobility access while promoting improved health, economic growth, public safety, recreational opportunity, environmental sustainability, and social equality throughout the City of Atlanta.
2.0 STREET USERS
The City of Atlanta shall be comprised of a completely connected multimodal network that provides safe and efficient travel for all pedestrians, bicyclists, transit users, freight deliveries, and motorists. Recognizing that everyone is a pedestrian at some point in the day, and pedestrians and bicyclists are the most vulnerable users of the roadway, it is critical to ensure that Atlanta’s streets encourages safe movement and networks for those modes.
The City of Atlanta will incorporate the Multimodal Streets Policy into all City and State-owned transportation facilities and projects in the public right-of-way. All projects shall be planned with the goal of establishing, maintaining, and expanding the completely connected multimodal network. In addition, designated freight/truck routes shall provide access for commercial vehicles of the most appropriate size for urban freight delivery. All private roadways will be strongly encouraged to follow these guidelines and principles of multimodalism and connectivity and should be designed in context and consideration of enhancing the transportation network.
2.1 STREET AND NETWORK CONNECTIVITY
The City of Atlanta will prioritize opportunities to create a safe multimodal transportation network that provides connected facilities to serve all users and modes of transportation for current and future use. Streets shall be connected to create complete networks that provide travelers with multiple choices of modes and routes and help reduce crashes and congestion on roadways. Street and subdivision designs are critical to creating and maintaining a connected network. Designs with cul-de-sacs shall be discouraged and through streets shall be designed with the appropriate traffic calming measures to discourage unsafe travel.
2.2 CITY DEPARTMENTS COLLABORATION
The City of Atlanta will approach every public or private project, program and practice that affects the transportation network or occurs in the right-of-way as an opportunity to improve the street conditions and travel routes for everyone. All City departments will coordinate and collaborate with internal and external stakeholders to maximize all Multimodal Streets opportunities and connectivity.
2.3 SCOPE
The City of Atlanta will apply the Multimodal Streets Policy in a context-sensitive manner to all public roadways and encourage its use on privately-owned streets that serve the general public. It applies to new construction, reconstruction, retrofit, resurfacing, repaving, and major repairs. This Policy shall apply to all City owned facilities in the right of way, which includes, but not limited to, parking, bridges, alleys, frontage roads, temporary traffic control zones, bicycle-pedestrian paths, park streets, and other elements of the City’s transportation system. Public roadway projects must incorporate appropriate stormwater management facilities and, where feasible, implement green infrastructure practices to reduce stormwater runoff volumes and improve regional water quality. The project scope and construction limits will be used as project parameters in determining the limits of the Multimodal Streets Policy for each project.
2.4 APPLICABILITY
The City of Atlanta will use the Multimodal Streets Policy for all improvements within the right-of-way and applicability shall be considered for streets that are not within the city’s street system.
Accommodations for walking, cycling, driving, transit, and green stormwater infrastructure will be made to the greatest extent possible and where feasible, appropriate, and fiscally practical and will be documented in the Multimodal Streets Project Concept Report. If certain travel modes are not appropriate or unable to be accommodated, the constraints and other factors shall be documented in the Project Concept Report for review and approval by the Commissioners of the Department of Public Works, City Planning, Watershed Management, and for Renew Atlanta/ TSPLOST projects, the Renew Atlanta General Manager.
This policy will not apply to projects that, at the time of the adoption of this policy, have already developed conceptual level plans (typically 30% design), changes to which would significantly impact project design costs, implementation timeline, or public engagement requirements.
2.5 DESIGN STANDARDS
The City of Atlanta will use the latest design guidance, standards, and recommendations available to maximize design flexibility and innovation, and always be aware that design solutions should balance user and modal needs. This includes a shift toward designing at the human scale for the needs and comfort of all people and travelers, in considering issues such as street design and width, desired operating speed, hierarchy of streets, and connectivity. Design criteria shall not be purely prescriptive but shall be based on the thoughtful application of engineering, architectural, and urban design principles. These materials include, but are not limited to:
• The City of Atlanta’s Streets Atlanta: A Design Manual for Multimodal Streets
• City of Atlanta public right-of-way standard details maintained by the Departments of Public Works and Watershed Management
• Department of Watershed Management’s Rules and Regulations Governing the Development of Sanitary and Storm Sewers, and Green Infrastructure Strategic Action Plan
• The United States Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration’s (FHWA) Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD)
• The FHWA Separated Bike Lane Planning and Design Guide, and other associated publications.
• The AASHTO Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets
• The American Association of State Highway and Transportation Official’s (AASHTO) Roadway Design Guide
• The AASHTO Guide for Planning, Design, and operations of Pedestrian Facilities
• The AASHTO Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities and other associated publications.
• The National Association of City Transportation Officials (NACTO) Urban Street Design Guide
• NACTO Transit Street Design Guide
• NACTO Urban Bikeway Design Guide
• NACTO Global Streets Design Guide and other associated publications.
• Designing Walkable Urban Thoroughfares: A Context Sensitive Approach, A joint publication from the Institute for Transportation Engineers (ITE) and the Congress for New Urbanism (CNU).
2.6 COMMUNITY AND CONTEXT SENSITIVE
The City of Atlanta will provide a context-sensitive Multimodal Street design that will align with the local character and context of the neighborhood, land use, current and future transportation needs.
2.7 ANNUAL REPORT AND ESTABLISHING PERFORMANCE MEASURES
The application of Multimodal Streets will be a process that requires regular evaluation to determine progress and effectiveness. To facilitate that regular evaluation, the Commissioners of Public Works and Planning and Community Development shall provide a written report to the City Council on a regular basis on the progress and effectiveness of the Multimodal Streets Policy. The report shall take into account all projects in the public right-of-way implemented under the Multimodal Streets Policy regardless of the implementation agency. The report shall include measures such as:
• Miles of new bike lanes and bikeways by type
• Number of bicycle parking facilities installed
• Linear feet of new or repaired sidewalk
• Miles of new multi-use trails
• Number of ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act) accessibility improvements
• Number of crosswalks improvements
• Number of green stormwater infrastructure projects and volume of runoff reduced
• Number enhanced transit facilities or bust stops
• Summary of capital project before/after data reports
3.0 POLICY IMPLEMENTATION
The City of Atlanta will use the Multimodal Streets Policy as a guiding principle in the decision-making process for projects in the right-of-way using project scope and construction limits as project parameters. The City of Atlanta shall make Multimodal Street practices a routine part of everyday operations and procedures. The following directives will be used to ensure Multimodal Streets are considered for all projects:
• Utilize the City of Atlanta’s “Multimodal Streets Project Concept Report Form” and the Streets Atlanta: A Design Manual for Multimodal Streets
• Restructure or revise related procedures, plans, regulations (including zoning and subdivision regulations), and other processes to accommodate all users on every project.
• Develop new design policies and guidelines or revise existing to reflect the current state of best practices in transportation design. Atlanta may also elect to adopt national or state-level recognized design guidance.
• Develop and institute better ways to measure performance and collect data on how well the streets are serving all users.
• Promote inter-departmental project coordination with respect to activities in the public right- of-way.
(74)Has Data
No data
Colorado Springs
Toledo
Chicago
Tulsa
Honolulu
Newark
Lincoln
Austin
Jacksonville
Tampa
Virginia Beach
Miami
Mesa
Wichita
St. Louis
Omaha
Dallas
Orlando
Fort Worth
Nashville
Detroit
Boston
Philadelphia
Pittsburgh
Saint Paul
Phoenix
Kansas City
Houston
Milwaukee
Columbus
San Antonio
Atlanta
Portland
New York
Denver
Memphis
Albuquerque
New Orleans
Oklahoma City
Washington, DC
Tucson
Minneapolis
Anaheim
Bakersfield
Durham
Fresno
Greensboro
Irvine
Long Beach
Los Angeles
Oakland
Raleigh
Riverside
Sacramento
San Diego
San Francisco
San Jose
Santa Ana
Stockton
Las Vegas
Charlotte
Baltimore
Louisville
Cleveland
Indianapolis
Anchorage
Arlington
Aurora
Cincinnati
Corpus Christi
Henderson
Lexington, Fayette County, Kentucky
Plano
Seattle
Labels